ANOTHER COFFEE BREAK: THE PSALM 23 ADVENTURE, Part 14
September
16, 2016
Because of where we need to go today with this discussion, let
me lay some foundations. It may well seem like
we’ve strayed from the 23rd Psalm and David’s prophecy, He restoreth my soul, but
bear with me. Everything we are discussing right now is absolutely
relevant to restoration and the need for restoration.
The Hebrew word used in Psalm 23 for “restoreth”
is the word: áeL, shub (pronounced
shoob). Its most literal meaning is “to turn
back,” and its usage in this instance means, “to return to the starting point.”
The “starting point” in God’s economy is seen in Genesis 1:26a: And God (the word in the Hebrew text is “Elohim”
– plural for Father, Son & Holy Spirit)
said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let
them have dominion…...
Verse 27 confirms that He did exactly that. Millennia had
passed since Adam and Eve ate of the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and
Evil. The human race had fallen far from the image and likeness of
God. David understood that and knew by the Spirit that “restoration”
meant a return to that same “starting point.”
Without getting back into the picture of the seven nations and
the overcoming that Israel failed to accomplish by the flesh, we come to the
seven letters and the overcoming which MUST take place in and by the
Spirit. The letter to Pergamos in Revelation 2
was a graphic picture of the necessity of overcoming the Fear of Man – and
that’s where we will continue today.
We’ve
already discussed the picture of Balaam and the consequences of his bowing to
the Fear of Man. The doctrine (or teaching) of Balaam was to worship
idols, to eat things offered to idols and to commit fornication. The Fear
of Man was prevalent in every single action and teaching of Balaam. But Pergamos’ failures didn’t stop with the “doctrine of
Balaam.” Pergamos had in its midst those who
held the “doctrine of the Nicolaitanes,” and that’s
where we need to go today.
Just
as Cain believed the lies of the Spirit of Rejection and the Fear of Man, so
also did Pergamos. Not only was "Satan's
seat" in their midst, they allowed him to dwell in their midst.
That's a nice, poetic way of saying that they permitted him to speak in their
midst -- and they listened to what he had to say.
The
letter to Pergamos begins with, "These things saith He which hath
the sharp sword with two edges...."
So
where was this sword? In the mouth of the Lord. (See Revelation
1:16)
The
Lord, therefore, was addressing with His mouth -- with the sharp sword which
came forth from His mouth -- the lies being perpetrated in their midst by the
mouth of Satan who was dwelling in their midst. His sword was the sword
of truth, as opposed to the mouth of lies, and that sword was going to cut to
the truth in their situation!
That
sword cut to the truth that they were listening to, and being manipulated by,
The Fear of Man -- and the sons of The Fear of Man: The Spirit of Rejection,
and The Fear of Rejection, as they were perpetrated in the doctrine of Balaam.
Pergamos not only had those
who promoted the doctrine of Balaam, but also those who promoted the doctrine
of the Nicolaitanes. We have already discussed
this at some length in previous Coffee Breaks, and I have referred to the
"doctrines" (plural) of the Nicolaitanes.
When you boil it all down, however, the doctrine (singular) of the Nicolaitanes was one: Power to Man.
It
was manifested two variants which we have discussed: namely, "Power Over
the People," and "Power to the People." Whichever variant
you choose, it still had only one root: The Fear of Man. Let’s take a
quick look at the significance of these two uses of the contraction of “nicos” (power) and “laos” (the common people).
(Note:
Some Greek dictionaries or lexicons mistakenly translate “Nicolaitan”
as “a follower of Nicolaus – a heretic who led many
believers astray.” The problem is that Nicolaus
wasn’t even born when John wrote the Revelation. The 4th century
historian, Eusebius, refers to Nicolaus as an early 3rd century
heretic. He certainly came by his name correctly. Nicolaus DID believe and teach the doctrine of the Nicolaitanes, but that doctrine was well-established by Nicolaus’ day.)
Here’s
how the doctrine of the Nicolaitanes works.
If
you want authority vested in a few, you fear the multitudes. Hence, you
fear man. This doctrine was perpetrated in the early Ekklesias
by “converted” Sadducees who were proponents of the idea that the multitudes
were unable to properly make decisions, and that power needed to be vested in
an elite, tiered structure. We refer to this system as
“hierarchical.” What it amounted to was taking the authority of the Lord
Jesus Christ away from Him and vesting it a few who were supposed to “speak for
and on behalf of the Lord.” The teaching completely ignored the
leadership and teaching of Holy Spirit within the life of the believer.
If
you want authority vested in a system when everyone has a “vote," you fear
central authority in a man, or a group of men. It substitutes theocracy
for democracy. This aspect was promoted by “converted” Pharisees within
the Ekklesias. Hence, you still fear man.
(Much of the modern evangelical church structure is predicated on democratic structure.
The so-called “Charismatic Renewal” of the 60’s, 70’s and early 80’s did much
to eliminate the structures, whether they were hierarchical or democratic, but
the doctrine of the Nicolaitanes still exists today
within the body of Christ.)
[It’s
worth noting that America was NOT founded as a democracy! This nation was
founded as a “Republic” by our founding fathers, following the pattern that God
gave to Moses for the governance of Israel. The fact that we fell as a
nation into democracy was a perversion that has rapidly been becoming
anarchy.]
Again,
the doctrine of the Nicolaitanes was to take the
authority away from the Lord, and therefore, to vest that authority in a man,
or a few men, or a lot of men -- but still, man!
Got
the picture?
It
is still precisely the same thing which happened in the Garden when Satan
deceived Adam and Eve into eating from the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and
Evil. They took the decision-making authority away from the Lord in their
lives, and vested it in their "knowledge of good and evil."
The
doctrine of the Nicolaitanes was to take the
authority away from the Lord in the governing of the Ekklesias,
and vest it (by a vote) in those who take the titles of apostles, prophets,
evangelists, pastors, and teachers -- at first. All under the guise of
the governance of the Lord, you understand.
Please
don’t misunderstand what I’m saying here. God clearly ordained (and
still ordains!) apostles, prophets, evangelists, pastors (or shepherds) and
teachers. The difference is that HE does the calling, and HE does the
ordaining – NOT by a vote of the people or their leaders. There is a
specific and visible anointing of Holy Spirit in and upon those who genuinely
are called and appointed by God, and that anointing clearly defines and
separates those who are anointed, and those who are not.
The
doctrine of the Nicolaitanes quickly devolved into episkopos, presbuteros, and diakonos. And then in bishops -- and what have you -- with so many
tiers of beaurocracy it just became ludicrous.
Any semblance of personal intimacy with the Lord was gone completely.
For
the sake of definition of the Greek terms, the word, episkopos, describes someone
with prophetic oversight – who can see ahead into the plan and purpose of God
and provide that oversight to the Ekklesias.
This word has been translated in many NT translations as “Bishop” and –
depending on your church upbringing – represents someone who has been titled as
such by a decision of those “above” him in an ecclesiastical hierarchy.
The
Greek word, presbuteros, comes from its
root, presbus, for “older,” or “a
senior” – one who is experienced and well-seasoned by years. It is the
word translated as “elder” in the NT. It was not a title. It simply
represented those who were well-seasoned in the Lord, in the Word, and in the
ways of the Lord. (The modern usage of this word is, Presbyter.) No
one voted or decided that certain individuals were “elders.” They were
elders by reason of their years, their experience and seasoning in God.
Lastly,
we have the word, diakonos. Used today as
a title for someone who is “a deacon,” the word literally means “servant,
waiter – one who carries out and executes the commands of another.” To
put this word in its proper context, you understand that Jesus referred to
Himself as diakonos, and encouraged His
disciples to place themselves as those who both executed the commands of Father
God, and served the Ekklesias.
My
apologies for taking time for these descriptions, but what I’m getting at is
the fact that the Fear of Man has turned these descriptive words into titles
and positions from which power and authority can be used over the so-called
“common people” in such a way as to elevate the “titled ones” above everyone
else.
Above
and beyond this, it robbed those who were serving in the ministries of
apostles, prophets, pastors, etc., of the intimacy in their relationship with
the Lord by creating a false responsibility for a false government with a beaurocracy within the Body of Christ.
Is
it any wonder, therefore, that the Lord repeatedly said, "which thing I hate!"
See
what the Fear of Man does to a person?
There
are some other graphic pictures in the Word where we see this spirit at work,
but let’s leave it here and move on in our discussion to dealing with the Fear
of Evil.
NOW
you can see why the restoration of our soul is so critical! Without being
rid of these wicked and compromising spirits in our lives, true restoration is
impossible.
We’ve
kind of taken these in reverse order but the Fear of Evil is the granddaddy of
all fears — regardless of what they are called or how they are named.
When
David wrote, He restoreth my soul, he
was describing from a prophetic perspective an adventure in God that sets the
stage for going forward in everything that God is out to accomplish.
Without this restoration — and specifically, restoration from the spirits
of fear — we will literally freeze up in our future growth as Holy Spirit seeks
to take us in the paths of righteousness. Because of where the Lord is
taking us and how He is (and will) leading us, we cannot draw
back, even the slightest, from His commands or the prompts of Holy
Spirit.
That
said, let’s take a second (or third?) look at the events that unfold in the
third chapter of Genesis.
Genesis 2:9: And out of the ground made the LORD God to grow every tree that
is pleasant to the sight, and good for food; the tree of life also in the midst
of the garden, and the tree of knowledge of good and evil.
Genesis 2:16-17: And the LORD God commanded the man, saying, Of every tree of the
garden thou mayest freely eat: But of the tree of the
knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it:
for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die.
This
is the standard that God sets! First of all, He creates trees which
produce fabulous looking fruit — fruit which is really good
to eat. He doesn’t give Adam and Eve a fistful of laws and
commandments. He simply reserves one of the ten genus of trees to Himself
and says, “Don’t touch!”
He
follows that one simple command with a warning, and in that warning comes
embodied the principles of agape. We can paraphrase it like this:
“I’ve created you to live and fellowship with me forever!
I will impart to you every piece of knowledge and wisdom you will ever need,
but if you eat of the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil, all of that will
be stripped away from you and you will die! Don’t eat of that tree
because there is death in it! Your flesh was never designed to gain
knowledge without revelation.”
Does
that make it clear to you? Good! Now you can see the significance
of David’s use of the word, shub, to describe the need for our “return
to the beginning.” Put another way we can
phrase this, “a return to the time before Adam and Eve ate of the Tree of the
Knowledge of Good and Evil.” In other words, it spelled out a return to
all that Adam and Eve were in Eden, and all that we were created to be In the Beginning.
Let’s
stop here and follow this in more detail next week.
I remind those of you in need of ministry that our Healing
Prayer Call normally takes place on the first Monday of each month at 7:00 PM
Eastern (4:00 PM Pacific). Our call-in number is (712) 775-7035. The
Access Code is: 323859#.
For Canadians who have difficulty getting in to this number, you can call (559) 546-1400.
If someone answers and asks what your original call-in number was, you can give
them the 712 number and access code.
At the same time, in case you are missing out on real fellowship
in an environment of Ekklesia, our Sunday worship
gatherings are available by conference call – usually at about 10:45AM
Pacific. That conference number is (605)
562-3140, and the access code is 308640#.
We hope to make these gatherings available by Skype or Talk Fusion before
long. If you miss the live call, you can dial (605) 562-3149, enter
the same access code and listen in later.
Blessings
on you!
Regner
A. Capener
CAPENER MINISTRIES
RIVER
WORSHIP CENTER
Sunnyside, Washington 98944
Email
Contact: Admin@RiverWorshipCenter.org
All
Coffee Break articles are copyright by Regner A. Capener, but authorization for
reprinting, reposting, copying or re-use, in whole or in part, is granted
–provided proper attribution and this notice are included intact. Older Coffee
Break archives are available at http://www.RegnersMorningCoffee.com. Coffee Break
articles are normally published weekly.
If you would like to have these articles arrive each morning in your email,
please send a blank email to: Subscribe@AnotherCoffeeBreak.com.To remove yourself
from the mailing list, please send a blank email to Unsubscribe@AnotherCoffeeBreak.com.
CAPENER
MINISTRIES is a tax-exempt church ministry. Should
you desire to participate and covenant with us as partners in this ministry,
please contact us at either of the above email or physical addresses, or
visit: http://www.RiverWorshipCenter.org.